<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Historic on timeING</title><link>https://me.timholthaus.com/tags/historic/</link><description>Recent content in Historic on timeING</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 06:00:23 +0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://me.timholthaus.com/tags/historic/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Jevons Paradox: Efficiency That Increases, Not Saves, Energy Use</title><link>https://me.timholthaus.com/posts/stories/20260410_jevons_paradox/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 06:00:23 +0600</pubDate><guid>https://me.timholthaus.com/posts/stories/20260410_jevons_paradox/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="an-introduction-to-the-jevons-paradox"&gt;An introduction to the Jevons Paradox&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;William Stanley Jevons published &lt;em&gt;The Coal Question&lt;/em&gt; in 1865, warning that improving the efficiency of coal‑powered steam engines might not reduce coal consumption; it could increase it because cheaper power would spread across more industries and households.&lt;sup id="fnref:1"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;sup id="fnref:2"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:2" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; His observation—that making a resource use more efficient can lead to &lt;em&gt;more&lt;/em&gt; consumption overall, not less—has become known as the &lt;strong&gt;Jevons Paradox&lt;/strong&gt;, often discussed today under the broader idea of “rebound effects.”&lt;sup id="fnref:3"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:3" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;sup id="fnref1:2"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:2" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>